What it is
- Wi-Fi 6/6E/7 design for production environments: warehouses, plants, hospitals, schools, conference venues.
- IoT connectivity strategy across LoRaWAN, BLE, Zigbee, and cellular IoT — chosen by use case, not preference.
- Wireless co-existence: what to do when Wi-Fi, BLE, Zigbee, and DAS are all trying to live on the same metal.
When you need it
- A new facility, expansion, or renovation that needs Wi-Fi designed before walls go up.
- A current network is missing performance targets and you need an independent diagnosis before re-investing.
- A sensor or IoT deployment needs a connectivity architecture that won't trap you in a vendor's ecosystem.
Our methodology
- 01Use-case mapping. We map devices to performance requirements: not all clients are equal, and the architecture flows from the hardest one.
- 02Predictive + on-site survey. Predictive design followed by validation survey with calibrated equipment.
- 03Co-existence analysis. Spectrum planning across 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, 6 GHz, sub-GHz, BLE, and overlapping cellular bands.
- 04Engineered design. AP placement, antenna selection, switching/cabling, controller architecture, and (where relevant) a migration plan from existing gear.
Documented assumptions. Every methodology step generates a record. You see the inputs, the calibration data, and the gaps — not a pretty PDF with conclusions you can't audit.
Typical deliverables
- Predictive heat maps with device-class assumptions
- On-site validation report
- Co-existence and spectrum plan
- Network design with BOM, cabling, and AP placement
- Acceptance test plan
Representative outcomes
Designed
for the hardest device, not the average one
Documented
assumptions you can challenge and we can defend
Vendor-flexible
designs that survive an OEM swap
Next step
Have a coverage problem you can describe — but not yet solve?
Request a wireless assessment. An engineer (not a sales rep) will walk through what you're seeing and propose what we'd actually do.